[TowerTalk] Fwd: Source for (4) 265 foot towers.

[Hans Hammarquist]

There is no "maximum high" for a ham tower. The 200 feet limitation is the high above which you have to involve the bureaucracy with all the applications needed. Maybe you want to avoid that, maybe not. Is it worth it for those extra 65 feet you want? I believe you won't get much advantage from a propagation point-of-view.


Good luck with your station. I'm getting blue of envy already even if I feel my 85 feet are good enough.



Hans - N2JFS



-----Original Message-----
From: Drax Felton <draxfelton at gmail.com>
To: john nistico <electric911inc at hotmail.com>; towertalk <towertalk at contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, Feb 25, 2016 7:36 pm
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Source for (4) 265 foot towers.

Your above the special restrictions height. Just so you're aware.  http://www.hamradioschool.com/g1b01-maximum-antenna-structure-height/Sent from Outlook MobileOn Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:48 PM -0800, "john nistico" <electric911inc at hotmail.com> wrote:I am looking to build my retirement station consisting of 4-265 foot towers with stacked mono banders  on each band and wires for 80 and 160 meters. The monos would be 4 over 4 on 40m6 over 6 on 20m, and 7 over 7 on 15 and 10. I am open to suggestions I did reach out to a company in New Hampshire but got no reply.______________________________________________________________________________________________TowerTalk mailing listTowerTalk at contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk______________________________________________________________________________________________TowerTalk mailing listTowerTalk at contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk