[TowerTalk] Fair rite materials for choke baluns
jimlux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Wed Jul 6 09:12:24 EDT 2016
On 7/5/16 11:01 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On Tue,7/5/2016 5:02 PM, Jim Thomson wrote:
>
> Somehow, you seem to miss the point, which is NOT gain, but rather
> keeping RF picked up on the feedline from coupling to the antenna, and
> from there via the feedline in differential mode to the receiver.
I wouldn't think of it as a gain thing, but more that there's coupling
between the feedline and antenna, and then (the shield of) the feedline
becomes "part" of the antenna system.
I don't know that it would change gain all that much, but it could
certainly ruin a null.
And it might provide a path from a near field noise source (some low
level RFI source that's very close to the feedline), but then, you'd
really want a choke near the noise source.
>
>> ## the yagis at the time all used gamma or omega matches... an no
>> CMCs used.
>
> Just because you never saw it doesn't mean that it's not good practice.
> It just means you never saw an installation where someone was smart
> enough to do it. :) Good practice is to do whatever the mfr of the
> antenna designed for matching, and then ADD a common mode choke.
>
> When I first published my work on using ferrite chokes at the feedpoint
> of antennas, guys in our contest club started doing it and found that
> their antennas were quieter. Guys in multi-transmitter stations found
> less interaction between stations. This includes everything from
> dipoles, to monoband and multiband arrays of aluminum, to SteppIRs, and
> is independent of how they are fed. Even verticals benefit from a coax
> choke at the feedpoint.
>
I think that's generally the whole "if you avoid large conducting things
near your antenna, and particularly, connected to your antenna, they
work better".
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list