[TowerTalk] HFTA Disc....

[David Gilbert]

HFTA has a feature allowing you to actually plot your terrain file, and 
maybe that is indeed how you compared the two.  I'd bet that there is a 
difference in the "choppiness" of the two plots.  HFTA calculates 
dispersion and refraction of the various rays, as well as the secondary 
dispersion and reflection of those dispersed/refracted rays.  The 
combinations can get pretty intricate.  Sharper edges in the plots would 
give different results than smoother transitions ... perhaps 
significantly so if the transitions are appreciably sharp relative to a 
wavelength.

73,
Dave AB7E


On 7/16/2016 6:38 PM, N3AE wrote:
>
> As an experiment this afternoon, I took a 30 meter resolution DEM data file and truncated it beyond 1470 meters so I could compare the results with 149 pairs of 10 meter resolution data that ended at 1490 meters from the tower. Once again, the two elevation profile plots were essentially on top of each other, differing by less than 2 ft at any range. But the takeoff angle plots still differed quite a bit. Not sure what's going on inside HFTA that causes this "butterfly effect" sensitivity to differences in terrain elevations, at least in the elevation profiles for my QTH.
>
> Shawn
> N3AE
>