[TowerTalk] Mast Material
Steve Maki
lists at oakcom.org
Sun Mar 13 21:27:11 EDT 2016
On 3/13/2016 9:01 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:
>> A good alternative to schedule 40 pipe is the tubing used nowadays for
>> fence top rails, known as SS40. It's lighter (thinner wall) but stronger
>> and actually less expensive than galvanized sch. 40 pipe if purchased
>> from the right place.
>>
>> We routinely use it on cell sites for antenna masts in place of sch. 40.
>>
>> Here are the specs:
>>
>> http://www.hooverfence.com/catalog/chart.htm
>>
>> -Steve K8LX
> Note that the outer diameter of fence tubing will always
> be the same as the outer diameter of some standard water
> pipe size. E.G. Both "1 7/8 inch" fence tubing
> and "1 1/2 inch" water pipe (any schedule) actually
> have an outer diameter of 1.900 inch. Either can be
> shimmed with standard 2" OD aluminum irrigation pipe with
> 0.050 inch wall to fit standard 2.000" mast clamps
> or bearings.
>
> I don't know why they make fence tubing and pipes the
> same size. One theory is that you if you want to build
> a fence on steroids, water pipe can be substituted for
> fence tubing very easily. (Attention: Donald Trump :-)
> Or maybe they make both of them on the same equipment.
> (Obviously, I have spent way too much time loitering
> in hardware stores.)
Hehe.
But I'm not sure why substituting schedule 40 for SS40 in fence
applications or any other (except plumbing perhaps) would be an
*upgrade*. A quick search didn't yield specs for sch. 40 that would lend
itself to an applicable comparison, but the fence people claim that SS40
is *stronger* than sch. 40.
In the fence business there are numerous tee couplers, etc. already
sized for stand sch 40 OD's, which probably drove the size constraints
for SS40.
-Steve K8LX
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list