[TowerTalk] Prelube 6 vs. Prelube 19

[Jeff Draughn]

I was under the impression that lube was a No no as it holds dirt and wears
things out quicker.
Is that not the case here?
Thanks
Jeff



On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 7:44 AM WK1W-Ivan Shapiro <WK1W at ivanshapiro.com>
wrote:

> I bought and use Prelube 6 in spray cans. Because not as efficient in
> lubing
>
> up/down cables as "paint-on" with brush, I searched around last night.  I
>
> found the post below from 2010.
>
>
>
> So I have four questions:  (1) Source for a can (non-spray) of Prelube 6? ;
>
> (2) Opinions re Pre 6 vs Preube 19;  (3) any users of 19?  (4) Users and
>
> opinion re STRANCORE (noted in below response).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks and 73
>
>
>
> Ivan Shapiro  WK1W
>
>
>
> WK1W at ivanshapiro.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Dan,
>
>
>
> I received this response from Grignard Company to my question of whether
>
>
>
> Prelube 19 is more effective than Prelube 6 in preventing rust and
> extending
>
> the life of
>
>
>
> galvanized wire rope used in antenna towers. (I am not familiar with the
>
> Strancore he refers too, I'll have to check it out)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Yes PreLube 19 would work better however it does skin which could be a
>
>
>
> problem with telescoping poles. Strancore is the best product for this
>
> application. About 20 x the protection
>
>
>
> of prelube 6 and does not skin."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> TowerTalk mailing list
>
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>