[TowerTalk] Tower Foundation Pouring
Hardy Landskov
n7rt at cox.net
Fri Feb 3 19:30:58 EST 2017
I think the lawyers also had a hand in the wording to protect the company.
73 N7RT
-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
JVarney
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 6:20 PM
To: towertalk at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Foundation Pouring
That's where the urban myth came from. It's on tower manu- facturers plans
but it gets misinterpreted as gospel. If we couldn't use forms and compacted
backfill, there would be thousands of buildings, bridges and retaining walls
that never would have been built.
I think the cast-in-hole against undisturbed soil method is great as long as
the soil can hold a vertical face. In loose soils that cave in, open forms
and compacted backfill may be a better solution. Unusual soils may need a
custom design because the manufacturer's generic design may prove inadequate
at that location. This is also true for sidehill locations.
73 Jim K6OK
Dick W1KSZ wrote:
>> I think it's more than just an ..."urban myth"... .
>> From what I have seen, it's recommended by the Tower Manufacturer.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list