[TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: anti-climb, litigation, attractive

[W4AAW@aol.com]

Careful Hans.  You are dangerously close to getting spanked.  Please keep your humorous comments to yourself.

My butt still hurts.

(What kind of Scotch do you stock?)



Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone

----- Reply message -----
From: "Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk" <towertalk at contesting.com>
To: <towertalk at contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Fwd:  Fwd:  anti-climb, litigation, attractive
Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2017 10:20 AM

Where did this come from? Do they have the same right to enter my house and empty my liquor supply?

Hans - N2JFS

-----Original Message-----
From: W4AAW Mike Lonneke via TowerTalk <towertalk at contesting.com>
To: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk at contesting.com>
Sent: Sat, Feb 11, 2017 7:12 am
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: anti-climb, litigation, attractive



No matter what you do, Judge Robarts will rule that the illegal climber has a Constitutional right to trespass and climb your tower.

He will be upheld by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. You don't have the authority to keep trespassers from climbing your tower and, you have not cited any examples that show that people who did not climb were not injured!

HI
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk