[TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun
Jim Thomson
jim.thom at telus.net
Sat Feb 18 12:09:59 EST 2017
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:44:50 -0700
From: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws at triconet.org>
To: towertalk at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] What am I missing....balun
Maybe so, I could be wrong. But my experience has been with RG142 which I had a
bunch of at one time. In the AZ sunshine the jacket cracked and I had a mess of
tarnished silver on my hands. And if you pigtail this stuff and try to seal it,
nothing wants to stick.
(In my location where I run cable on the ground instead of digging trenches in
the desert that will show for 100 years, I have a choice of rattlesnakes or pack
rats. I try to leave the snakes alone to keep the rats down, but when they come
into the garage, they have to go and we have a rat problem. I tried cats, but
the coyotes and owls like them. So it's Heliax to the rescue.)
>
>
> And when you criticize the enclosure and believe it is unnecessary, you're
> wrong; the outer jacket on that coax would last about 15 minutes out in the weather.
>
> Wes N7WS
>
> ## are u sure about that ? FEP-9 is what is used on the outer jacket of RG-393.
> Its supposed to be impervious to extremes in heat, cold, UV, sunlight, and everything else
> you can throw at it.
>
> Jim VE7RF
#### Both 142 and also 393 use the same FEP-9 outer jacket. I found only one site that stated
FEP-9 could be used outdoors. All the other sites mention nothing about outdoor use.
I have an application where some short lengths of 393 will have to be used outdoors. I think
to be safe, I will wrap the entire length with some 33 or 88 tape first. Then UV should not
be an issue. That or some of that split loom plastic stuff.
Jim VE7RF
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list