[TowerTalk] FW: Tower Grounds

john at kk9a.com john at kk9a.com
Tue Oct 17 12:59:17 EDT 2017


All of the ground rods that I have seen are 1/16 undersized in diameter. I
was not aware that these did not meet code. I have been buying 3/4 ground
rods from an electrical supply house because the 5/8 ones did not fit the
5/8 Polyphaser ground strap clamps that I use.

John KK9A



To:	towertalk at contesting.com
Subject:	Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Tower Grounds
From:	Grant Saviers <grants2 at pacbell.net>
Date:	Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:15:30 -0700

When I upgraded my tower grounds, I bought rods at a commercial electrical
supply house and Home Depot. The 5/8" rods looked a bit small and a
caliper showed them undersized. I then checked some 1/2" I had on the
shelf, and they were undersized also. I found this article

http://www.galvanelectrical.com/pdf/groundrodmarkingcompliance.pdf

I have never seen a "code compliant" stamped ground rod. Also, I have no
way to measure Cu plating thickness, but would assume it was cheated on as
well. Probably they all came from China where 1" = 19mm.

One thing I did learn in measuring the results was that #2 wire
contributed significantly to reducing the DC resistance of a leg (35' #2
plus 2x 8' x "5/8" rods). (some earlier rods were #8 connected). Since #2
is 0.258" diameter (mine is USA #2) and 5/8 rods were about 0.58" the
circumference ratio is 2.24. So 35' of #2 solid earth contact area is
about equal to 2x 8' x 5/8- rods. Of course buried 6" the field
distribution is a bit odd, but at DC it helped to get near to the Motorola
5 ohm target. Also, I'm confident the #2 copper will be there after the
copper flash on the rods is long gone.

Additional reasons to use a Ufer.

Grant KZ1W
_______________



More information about the TowerTalk mailing list