[TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 89
KX2CMC
kx2cmc at comcast.net
Sun Oct 22 17:07:56 EDT 2017
While I’m a new member, I’m all in favor of larger digests.
I receive a number each day from different groups and this one sends out far more than any other group I belong to.
Just my 2 cents. 73’s,
---
Pete Fawcett, KX2CMC
> On Oct 22, 2017, at 16:18, towertalk-request at contesting.com wrote:
>
> Send TowerTalk mailing list submissions to
> towertalk at contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> towertalk-request at contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> towertalk-owner at contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Digest Length (Wilson Lamb)
> 2. Re: Digest Length (Jim Rhodes)
> 3. Re: Digest size? (Bryan Swadener)
> 4. Re: Digest size? (Jim Rhodes)
> 5. Re: Digest size? (jimlux)
> 6. Re: Digest size? (Bryan Fields)
> 7. Re: Digest size? (Wayne Carlson, K2DT)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:51:51 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet at embarqmail.com>
> To: towertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: [TowerTalk] Digest Length
> Message-ID:
> <2019886604.107021295.1508691111665.JavaMail.root at embarqmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I'd like the length MUCH longer, so I get one or two/day, max.
> What's wrong with 100K?
> If one wants faster updates, he can choose to get every msg, can't he?
> WL
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:11:15 -0500
> From: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu at gmail.com>
> To: Wilson Lamb <infomet at embarqmail.com>
> Cc: towertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest Length
> Message-ID:
> <CALhxr4aZovj4jwCronFDqhmKL3qYgh_vYKxoiriBNfH8AS1Hwg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Matters not to me. If it says "digest" on any reflector I just delete.
>
> Jim Rhodes
> K0XU
>
>> On Oct 22, 2017 11:51, "Wilson Lamb" <infomet at embarqmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like the length MUCH longer, so I get one or two/day, max.
>> What's wrong with 100K?
>> If one wants faster updates, he can choose to get every msg, can't he?
>> WL
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:40:02 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Bryan Swadener <bswadener at yahoo.com>
> To: "towertalk at contesting.com" <towertalk at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
> Message-ID: <938590914.2230248.1508694002188 at mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> And do this too:
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>
> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>
> vy 73,
> Bryan WA7PRC
>
> Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:24:53 -0500
> From: Clay KY5G
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
>
> Sure..... but I wish we'd have a reminder to trim quotes and sig block
> repeats, et al...
>
>> On 10/21/2017 12:18 PM, k7lxc--- via TowerTalk wrote:
>> Howdy, TowerTalkians --
>>
>> I've recently had a request to make the digests larger and was wondering if you're interested in that. The size is currently 30 kb and it's pretty easy to change it. We could try 40 kb for starters or whatever. Your input requested.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Steve K7LXC
>> TT ADMIN
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:13:34 -0500
> From: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu at gmail.com>
> To: Bryan Swadener <bswadener at yahoo.com>
> Cc: towertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
> Message-ID:
> <CALhxr4bZ-enS0dU8jVz34UqqpTGkw5L7Sz3qnYAu3VYusb9AWg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> I long ago gave up on trying to read anything on posts labeled "digest".
> There were just too many people who replied with the entire digest. So now
> they are automatically deleted. Consequently I don't care. Delete buttons
> are good, filters to delete automatically are better.
>
> Jim Rhodes
> K0XU
>
> On Oct 22, 2017 12:40, "Bryan Swadener via TowerTalk" <
> towertalk at contesting.com> wrote:
>
>> And do this too:
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>
>> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>>
>> vy 73,
>> Bryan WA7PRC
>>
>> Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:24:53 -0500
>> From: Clay KY5G
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
>>
>> Sure..... but I wish we'd have a reminder to trim quotes and sig block
>> repeats, et al...
>>
>>> On 10/21/2017 12:18 PM, k7lxc--- via TowerTalk wrote:
>>> Howdy, TowerTalkians --
>>>
>>> I've recently had a request to make the digests larger and was wondering
>> if you're interested in that. The size is currently 30 kb and it's pretty
>> easy to change it. We could try 40 kb for starters or whatever. Your input
>> requested.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Steve K7LXC
>>> TT ADMIN
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 11:27:45 -0700
> From: jimlux <jimlux at earthlink.net>
> To: towertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
> Message-ID: <49fa768d-2b97-305f-24ff-cdd19a848150 at earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>> On 10/22/17 10:40 AM, Bryan Swadener via TowerTalk wrote:
>> And do this too:
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>
>> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>>
>
>
> I wonder if there are tools that the mailing list software can invoke to
> "auto de-digest" - seems a common enough problem..
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 14:42:29 -0400
> From: Bryan Fields <Bryan at bryanfields.net>
> To: "towertalk at contesting.com" <towertalk at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
> Message-ID: <1a2b82cd-8db7-4240-d36e-5ee0744ead94 at bryanfields.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
>> On 10/22/17 1:40 PM, Bryan Swadener via TowerTalk wrote:
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>
>> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>
> This still breaks threading.
>
> You need to add the In-Reply-To: headers as well. Mutt will handle this if
> you use the MIME formatted digest, or you can reply via the archives on the web.
>
> Granted we're dealing with hams and the proud to be ignorant. I don't hold
> out much hope.
>
> --
> Bryan Fields
>
> 727-409-1194 - Voice
> http://bryanfields.net
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:18:09 -0700
> From: "Wayne Carlson, K2DT" <k2dt at arrl.net>
> To: <towertalk at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
> Message-ID: <001d01d34b72$e1b27400$a5175c00$@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I'd be fine getting only one per day, whatever size that takes.
>
> 73, Wayne K2DT
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of TowerTalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 89
> ******************************************
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list