[TowerTalk] 80m vertical size calculation
jimlux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Wed Sep 13 15:11:15 EDT 2017
On 9/13/17 8:41 AM, V. Sciucka wrote:
> Thanks Gary K9RX and Charlie N1RR, 2nd question is clear now.
> Charlie also gave formula for length 246/f(mhz) = element (feet) which I
> assume includes length to diameter ratio or this ratio is not so much
> important.
>
the classic 246/f is the free space half wavelength. You'll see other
numbers too (e.g. 234..)
(see "Where Does 468 Come From?" at https://www.eham.net/articles/23802
for an interesting article by N0AX, which also mentions the 492)
The length of a resonant (defined as where the reactive term of the
feedpoint impedance) is slightly less than a half wavelength in free
space. How much less is weakly dependent on the length/radius.
length/radius ratio has a fairly strong effect on the "slope" of the
feedpoint reactance and resistance (more on the reactance than the
resistance), so it has a large effect on the VSWR bandwidth.
For a vertical, (or a low horizontal dipole), the soil properties will
have a significant effect on the "resonant" length - in general, making
it shorter than free space resonant (which in turn is shorter than free
space 1/4 or 1/2 wavelength)
Here is where modeling is your friend - almost any version of NEC can
quickly run through some variations of soil properties, diameters, etc.
and you can get an idea if you are worried about millimeters or meters.
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list