[TowerTalk] 80m vertical size calculation

jimlux jimlux at earthlink.net
Wed Sep 13 15:11:15 EDT 2017


On 9/13/17 8:41 AM, V. Sciucka wrote:
> Thanks Gary K9RX and Charlie N1RR, 2nd question is clear now.
> Charlie also gave formula for length 246/f(mhz) =  element (feet) which I
> assume includes length to diameter ratio or this ratio is not so much
> important.
>


the classic 246/f is the free space half wavelength.  You'll see other 
numbers too (e.g. 234..)
(see "Where Does 468 Come From?" at https://www.eham.net/articles/23802 
for an interesting article by N0AX, which also mentions the 492)

The length of a resonant (defined as where the reactive term of the 
feedpoint impedance) is slightly less than a half wavelength in free 
space.  How much less is weakly dependent on the length/radius.

length/radius ratio has a fairly strong effect on the "slope" of the 
feedpoint reactance and resistance (more on the reactance than the 
resistance), so it has a large effect on the VSWR bandwidth.


For a vertical, (or a low horizontal dipole), the soil properties will 
have a significant effect on the "resonant" length - in general, making 
it shorter than free space resonant (which in turn is shorter than free 
space 1/4 or 1/2 wavelength)

Here is where modeling is your friend - almost any version of NEC can 
quickly run through some variations of soil properties, diameters, etc. 
and you can get an idea if you are worried about millimeters or meters.






More information about the TowerTalk mailing list