[TowerTalk] Nested 4-Squares

n8de at thepoint.net n8de at thepoint.net
Fri Apr 20 18:13:51 EDT 2018


That's exactly what W3LPL has on 80/160.
You might email Frank and ask about it.

73
Don
N8DE

Quoting David Robbins <k1ttt at verizon.net>:

> My experience with 40m inside 80m says it is a bad idea.
>
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt at arrl.net
> web: http://wiki.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://k1ttt.net:7373
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of N5KM
> - Kris
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 19:24
> To: towertalk at contesting.com
> Subject: [TowerTalk] Nested 4-Squares
>
> Is nesting 4-Square arrays a good idea? By that I mean, for instance, an 80m
> 4-square inside a 160m 4-square. I was about to model this but it occurs to
> me that someone has probably already done this exercise.
>
> Good idea or bad idea?
>
> Kris N5KM
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>





More information about the TowerTalk mailing list