[TowerTalk] Solid 160 radial plates?
David Gilbert
xdavid at cis-broadband.com
Tue Aug 28 02:37:10 EDT 2018
I totally agree. I can't think of a single valid reason why a plate is
even a little bit better than simply a tie point at the base. I've often
wondered why folks don't simply use the addon bus bars for electrical
panels that you can buy at any Lowes or Home Depot. They are relatively
inexpensive, have screw connections, and make a fine non-corroding
contact. They can be daisy chained together for as many radials as you
have the ambition to put down. And if somebody wants to be a purist
about it, four of them arrayed in a square around the base makes way
more sense than a plate.
Dave AB7E
On 8/27/2018 2:47 PM, Don Havlicek wrote:
> A radial "plate" is highly overrated.
> Simply tie all the radials together at the base of the vertical.
> See the photo on my QRZ.COM page.
> 73
> Don
> N8DE
>
> Sent from my Verizon Motorola Smartphone
> On Aug 27, 2018 5:33 PM, Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa at nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:
>> I have a very old 10.5' aluminum satellite dish out in the woods.
>>
>>
>>
>> I keep thinking I should put this at the base of one of my 160m verticals,
>> right on the edge of the woods where the trees meet the lawn.
>>
>> Maybe I could get my wife to plant some ivy on it to eventually cover it all
>> up camo-style.
>>
>>
>>
>> Would it make any difference?
>>
>>
>>
>> ??
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike VE9AA
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list