[TowerTalk] Auto tuners, Baluns and open wire feeders
jimlux at earthlink.net
Tue Jul 17 16:50:43 EDT 2018
On 7/17/18 10:43 AM, Mark Spencer via TowerTalk wrote:
> I spent some time trying out various wire antennas at the summer cottage and have more or less settled upon a dipole antenna fed with a short length of open wire feeder that runs from the antenna feed point to slightly above ground level, the open wire feeder is in turn connected to a Johnson match box (a tuner with a balanced line connection), which in turn feeds a coaxial cable that runs to the radio. The tuner sat on top of a short step ladder during my tests.
> The coaxial cable had various mix 31 and mix 43 ferrite chokes applied. It all more or less worked as I expected it would on various bands.
> Moving forwards I'd like to replace the Johnson Matchbox with an auto tuner. At this point I'm leaning towards purchasing a suitable Balun from DX engineering, connecting that to the output of my SGC231 tuner and replacing the Johnson Match box with the Balun and the auto tuner. I'll have to do some modelling (to figure out the likely range of feed point impedances for the dipole antenna at various frequencies) before deciding on what ratio Balun to buy. I expect I'll install the auto tuner and Balun on top of a wooden pole perhaps 10 feet or so from the ground.
> I am curious if anyone else has done something along these lines and if there are any issues with doing so ? Any comments would be welcome.
> I'd like to move away from using a commercially made trap dipole at that location. (The appearance, lower weight and wind loading of a simple wire dipole with a short open wire feeder is attractive to me, plus I need to use a tuner to match the existing trap dipole.)
I support your idea..
Having the tuner at the feedpoint is the ideal. And whether the
circuitry inside the box is symmetric or not makes no difference. It's
Yes, you need a choke on the coax at the tuner (which is what forces the
above statement - you don't want currents going down the outside of the
I'm not actually sure you need a transformer at the antenna side tuner,
unless you're putting the tuner some distance away, in which case, the
higher Z balanced line *might* reduce the loss. But not necessarily,
unless it's "many wavelengths" long. That is, the loss through the
transformer, and a short <1/4 wavelength length of transmission line at
a different Z might actually be more than just the short length of
(in some ways, this isn't much different than an off center fed dipole:
being off center is effectively a transformer to a different impedance
than at the center)
You'd have to run the math on it.
The key thing you'll need is the "feedpoint Z vs frequency" of the
antenna and to know what frequencies you want to operate at.
The other thing you'll want to know is what's the loss in the tuner at
various mismatches. I believe this has actually been measured and
reported in QST and QEX.
Do you want to have X1 dB of loss in the tuner without a transformer, or
Y db of loss and Z dB of loss in the transformer, where you choose X or
(Y+Z). Again, it's something you need to calculate.
How long is your feeder? How long is your dipole? what bands are you
More information about the TowerTalk