[TowerTalk] 80M antenna wire size
jimlux
jimlux at earthlink.net
Mon Jan 6 08:47:49 EST 2020
On 1/5/20 7:11 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>
> What I HAVE done (about ten years ago) was to add a second #10 THHN to
> my Tee vertical for 160M, spaced roughly 8-10 inches from the first,
> wired in parallel top and bottom. The vertical section is 100 ft. The
> measured result was to approximately double the SWR bandwidth.
So, going from l/d of 12000 to 120 -> that's a big, big difference, and
the change in SWR bandwidth would be expected.
>
> My experience has been that when I correctly define the model (wire,
> insulation, height, soil parameters) NEC gives me pretty good
> correlation with what I measure when the antenna is built and installed.
> An example: for a CQP site we used for several years, I modeled a 40M
> dipole at the height we were able to rig it in the scrub trees at the
> site, and over poor soil, which is what is there. The model predicted 75
> ohms, so we brought RG11 for it. Our SWR bridge that was referenced to
> 75 ohms read close to 1:1 at resonance.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> On 1/5/2020 9:57 AM, Jim Thomson wrote:
>> 10 gauge wire provided for a much wider BW, vs the 16 +18
>> gauge I tried previously.
>> 2 other folks here in town tried the same experiment...with
>> same results.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list