[TowerTalk] Feed Point Choke Question
Jim Brown
jim at audiosystemsgroup.com
Sat Nov 7 13:56:35 EST 2020
I will not be drawn into debates about scientific concepts that have
long been well understood.
73, Jim K9YC
On 11/6/2020 12:58 PM, Artek Manuals wrote:
> Jim
>
> Show me the ACTUAL antenna range pattern measurement data with and
> without the common mode choke on a a similar antenna, with a reasonable
> SWR ( LESS THAN 1.5:1) and the feed line has been brought down
> perpendicular to the plane of the antenna and I will concede you the point
>
> Dave
> NR1DX
>
>
> On 11/6/2020 3:37 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>> On 11/6/2020 12:28 PM, Artek Manuals wrote:
>>> The short answer is how tight you make the turns will have little
>>> real world effect.
>>
>> That short answer is WRONG.
>>
>> Use the RG-8X I would probably use the #31 core over the
>>> 43 . The poor mans 8 turns of coax 4-5" in diameter without ferrites
>>> will probably actually work as well.
>>
>> Define "work." The important thing a choke should do is kill common
>> mode current on the feedline that couples noise to the antenna and
>> fills in nulls in the antenna's pattern. That "poor man's" solution
>> won't do much for that. If "work" means it won't overheat, yes, it
>> would "work."
>>
>>> Depending on SWR and feed line dressing (always perpendicular to the
>>> plane of the beam the need for choke at all� is arguable
>>
>> It's arguable only if you don't understand the problem, or don't care
>> about noise or the antenna's nulls.
>>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list