[TowerTalk] 4 square question

Michael Tope W4EF at dellroy.com
Sun Oct 18 19:00:08 EDT 2020


On 10/18/2020 11:49 AM, kq2m at kq2m.com wrote:
> 3) In the past I had the bottom of the 4-square elements soldered to center conductor of the pin of an SO239 with the radials attached to each of the SO239 screw holes, with the coax connector for the phasing line screwed onto the SO239.   (The choke was located below the PL259 on the phasing line) This worked well but I am trying to improve the design.
>
> If I were to terminate the bottom of the 4-square element by twisting it through and around one hole of the porcelain insulator and soldering it there, would I still be able to then solder a small wire from that connection to the center conductor pin of a SO239 with the radials attached to the SO239 screw holes as before?  My idea being that I can do that then I can use a piece of twine through the remaining porcelain insulator hole taped to the coax to provide additional physical support for the coax and radials – which will be helpful during ice storms

Solder is not very good for supporting mechanical loads, so what you 
describe above is a good idea. It will take the mechanical load off the 
solder connection between the SO239 center conductor and the radiator. 
Keep in mind that the "small piece of wire" adds to the electrical 
length of the radiator. A few inches probably won't make an appreciable 
difference, but I would keep that piece the same length on all 4 
elements just to be safe.

73, Mike W4EF..........

> I would appreciate any thoughts and suggestions and possible improvements on this design.
>
> Tnx  & 73
>
> Bob, KQ2M



More information about the TowerTalk mailing list