[TowerTalk] RG402 for Choke/Balun

Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H ea1ddo at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 18 10:00:33 EDT 2021


Just in case someone is interested;

RG402 Datasheet
https://www.pasternack.com/images/ProductPDF/RG402-U.pdf

RG400 Datasheet
https://www.pasternack.com/images/ProductPDF/RG400-U.pdf

Just to add, RG402 is easy to find in E-Bay or Aliexpress.

Will give a try and build one more choke (for 10, 15 and 20m) with RG402.
Hopefully nothing wrong happens...

73, Maximo



<http://foro.ea1ddo.es/>


________________________________
De: TowerTalk <towertalk-bounces at contesting.com> en nombre de john at kk9a.com <john at kk9a.com>
Enviado: jueves, 18 de marzo de 2021 13:07
Para: towertalk at contesting.com <towertalk at contesting.com>
Asunto: Re: [TowerTalk] RG402 for Choke/Balun

I have no experience with RG402.  It appears to be a little smaller
and it has a steel conductor.  What RF properties are better?

John KK9A


Máximo EA1DDO wrote:

Hi all,

I normally use RG400 for chokes on FT240 toroids.
Recently I've tryed RG402 semi-rigid coax cable, the "blue one".
RF properties are quite similar, in fact RG402 seems to be a bit
better than RG400.
Because RG402 is semi-rigid, is much easier to make tight turns on the
toroids, easier to work with.

After some months using it, HF bands legal limit amp, I can't see any issue.
Just wondering if I am missing anything, or if someone else have tried
the RG402 coax.

Thanks

73, Maximo

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


More information about the TowerTalk mailing list