[TowerTalk] Tower Collapse in South Dakota

[Lux, Jim]

On 1/21/23 1:33 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
> I think if I were in charge I'd require a setback of 50% of the height 
> of the tower or the distance to an occupied structure on the adjacent 
> property, whichever is larger. 


 From a regulatory standpoint the latter isn't really workable. The 
adjacent property owner could build a new structure (barring setbacks, 
etc.) that's closer to the boundary, after the tower is up.