[TowerTalk] Activity by Mode was: Re: Fwd: MFJ QRT on May 17, 2024
Joe Subich, W4TV
lists at subich.com
Mon Apr 29 11:33:23 EDT 2024
On 4/29/2024 11:08 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
> Looking at my own RBN node, I routinely spot CW signals with
> signal-to-noise ratios of as little as 4 dB. To be sure, FT8 is much
> better at signals below the threshold (I see -24 dB signals all the
> time), but 4 dB is pretty weak. So yes, there will be
> disproportionately more FT8 spots, but the RBN spots many relatively
> weak signals.
CW and FT8 spots/signal reports have completely different reference
levels. FT8 SNR is in a 2.7 KHz bandwidth while CW is in (maybe) a
100 Hz bandwidth. 20Log(2700/100) = 28(.6) dB ... the -24 dB FT8 spot
would be equivalent to a 4 dB CW spot!
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 4/29/2024 11:08 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
> I suspect this thread should move to another reflector, but before it
> does ... I don't want a few misconceptions to pass uncorrected.
>
> Steve says "note how many timers a CW caller is spotted on RBN while
> calling in a pileup." The answer, to the best of our ability, is NONE.
> It does happen very occasionally when the timing between caller and the
> called station's CQ is just right, and the caller is within 50 Hz of the
> CQer, but that's it. Split callers are never spotted by the RBN.
>
> Steve also asks "where are the RBN spots [in the CWTs?" The answer is,
> there are TONS. I don't have a huge signal, yet I was spotted over 100
> times in the last 10 minutes in the 19Z CWT last week. Yes, I was CQing.
>
> Looking at my own RBN node, I routinely spot CW signals with
> signal-to-noise ratios of as little as 4 dB. To be sure, FT8 is much
> better at signals below the threshold (I see -24 dB signals all the
> time), but 4 dB is pretty weak. So yes, there will be
> disproportionately more FT8 spots, but the RBN spots many relatively
> weak signals.
>
> I'm not arguing that the RBN is directly, precisely comparable to other
> tools for measuring activity, but it's what we have for CW.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>
More information about the TowerTalk
mailing list