SCP FILENAME obsolete?

[Larry Tyree]

Pete, N4ZR writes:

> Is SCP FILENAME obsolete?  I just got my first update since 5.73 and was
> trying out the TRMASTER.DTA file.  Wonderful improvement in available
> memory, and quite fast enough with my 486DX/33, but when I tried to put SCP
> FILENAME in my logcfg.dat file it stops.  Is this one no longer needed? I
> thought it was still there so that you could specify a filename other than
> TRMASTER.DTA but maybe not so. <<<?>>>

Yes, SCP FILENAME is no longer there.  I thought it would be less confusing.

Tree