SCP FILENAME obsolete?
Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Pete, N4ZR writes:
> Is SCP FILENAME obsolete? I just got my first update since 5.73 and was
> trying out the TRMASTER.DTA file. Wonderful improvement in available
> memory, and quite fast enough with my 486DX/33, but when I tried to put SCP
> FILENAME in my logcfg.dat file it stops. Is this one no longer needed? I
> thought it was still there so that you could specify a filename other than
> TRMASTER.DTA but maybe not so. <<<?>>>
Yes, SCP FILENAME is no longer there. I thought it would be less confusing.