A better idea???

[Bob Wruble]

i agree....let the other work on emulating tr!!

im off to xe2dv for the arrl fone and have go bak to 
using ct....have'nt convinced dick to step into the 
21st century on logging sw.......but i will

73 bob w7gg

----------
> From: n4si@pobox.com
> To: trlog@contesting.com; LarryX Tyree contractor for brentc <larrytx@co.intel.com>
> Subject: Re: A better idea???
> Date: Thursday, February 13, 1997 3:10 PM
> 
> 
> > I remember some peple were able to mostly simulate the way CT works by
> > programming their function keys to be the same in CQ and S&P modes.  Is 
> > anyone still doing that?
> > 
> > A long time ago, Mark, WA6OTU/N5OT suggested I have a CT emulator mode,
> > where all of the keystrokes worked the same as CT.  I still think that 
> > would be a programming nightmare, but perhaps there are a few simple 
> > things that could be done to make life easier for the CT addict.  
> 
> Tree,
> 
> A while back you had a post about wanting to see more contester's 
> stations featured on covers of magazines, etc., with TRLog instead of 
> Brand C. 
> 
> Last evening, a bunch of the local contest club had dinner and 
> several of the attendees; heavy hitters, I might add; practically had 
> a zen experience proselytizing TRLog over Brand C or Brand N.
> 
> With these two thoughts in mind, may I suggest forgetting about 
> emulating anyone. TRLog is the industry standard now, or will be. It 
> has the features and the support missing from the old standard, and 
> flexibility missing from the other very good competitor.
> 
> I see emulation as adding unnecessary overhead and baggage to your
> code, and which you acknowledge would be a programming nightmare.
> 
> It is time to let the others chase you, not vice versa.
> 
> 73, Rod N4SI
>     The DXer formerly known as N9AKE
>          (c) 5 November, 1996