[TRLog] CT or TRlog?

[Bob Wruble]

the ultimate difference for me (and i used ct for years) is
the superior support and quick response from tree 
when needed !!

w7gg

----------
> From: Jim Leahy <jleahy@norwich.net>
> To: TRlog <trlog@contesting.com>
> Subject: [TRLog] CT or TRlog?
> Date: Wednesday, July 02, 1997 2:51 PM
> 
> It's quite amusing that there are more and more messages saying that "CT
> does this and CT does that...CT logs actual frequencies...CT brews my
> coffee.....How about putting this feature in TR?" Well, there are certain
> things that separate TR from CT. And BTW, these certain things are what
> help make TR the superior program. One of which is its MANY features and
> ease of use while keeping it a SMALL program which doesn't hog much RAM. If
> you all love CT so much, stay with CT. Soon we'll have a TR version which
> basically resembles CT and will contain the same nuances that drove many of
> us away from CT to TR in the first place.
> 
> Let the flames from the usual suspects and Cliff Claven types begin.
> 
> Jim Leahy   K2JL
> jleahy@norwich.net
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
> Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com