[TRLog] Log rejected at ARRL??

[Gilbert Baron]

Tree N6TR wrote:
> 
> > I just realized...
> > TR strips off the ON/OFF statements in the Logs right??
> > (oops...)
> 
> Well - the ARRL's format doesn't allow for them!  You have to
> put this information in the summary sheet.
> 
> Tree
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
> Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com
> Feature Wishlist:         http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html


ARRL will accept it without that. They should, it is their problem. If
it is impossible to exceed the hours since the time of last qso in log
minus time of first is less than maximum then there is no problem. They
do accept. They may assume you operated continusously Only if more than
max is possible may they question you. ARLL really needs to fix this so
it can be automated.
-- 
Gil gbaron@sparc.isl.net 
Bailar es vivir
http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/Trails/4168

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html
Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist:	  http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html