[TRLog] Arghh. Halp. Need something entirely new from TR.

[Gary Ferdinand W2CS]

But that's not what Guy or I was talking about, Ron.

The marker would be the indicator of where you are CQing, not the indicator
of "packet spot conflict."  Thus, the true spot would exist with a ">" or
something next to it to indicate both the spot and the CQ. If no spot close
to CQ freq, then display what is displayed today.

73/Gary W2CS


> -----Original Message-----
> From: trlog-admin@contesting.com [mailto:trlog-admin@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of Ron D. Rossi
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:48 AM
> To: Gary Ferdinand W2CS
> Cc: TRLOG
> Subject: Re: [TRLog] Arghh. Halp. Need something entirely new from TR.
>
>
> >>>"Gary Ferdinand W2CS" said:
> >
> > I think Guy's idea has merit.   Don't overlay what would
> otherwise be going
> > into the bandmap by a CQ entry, but rather add a special
> character to denote
> > CQ frequency.
>
> It does have merit. Providing a warning would not be too
> difficult. Having a
> marker show up next to the CQ/### would be problematic. What
> makes it go away?
> Time? Yet another keystroke to remember? Something else? I would be very
> inclined to leave this one at the warning level.
>
> Before we get on a philosophical debate on cluster use and
> cheater detection
> can was focus on features?? Bring that up on CQ-Contest :)
>
> --
> 73 es God Bless de KK1L...ron rossi(kk1l@arrl.net) <><
> QTH: Jericho, Vermont
> My page: http://www.qsl.net/kk1l
>
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: trlog-admin@contesting.com [mailto:trlog-admin@contesting.com]On
> > > Behalf Of Tree N6TR
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 4:47 PM
> > > To: k2av@contesting.com; trlog@contesting.com
> > > Cc: n4af@contesting.com
> > > Subject: Re: [TRLog] Arghh. Halp. Need something entirely new from TR.
> > >
> > >
> > > > After reviewing UBN's from the CQWW, I can see that bad spots are
> > > > costing me points after the contest is over, e.g. NIL's that the log
> > > > checker can't relate to the real station.
> > > >
> > > > For example...
> > > >
> > > > NY4A is calling CQ on 40 on 7017. Someone in JA land spots KW4M at
> > > > 7017.
> > >
> > > I don't know.  If a call is close to yours, then it won't count as
> > > a NIL for you.  I actually feel that having some noise on the spots
> > > is a good thing - makes people either have errors in their log, or
> > > make them take the time to hear the call right.  If JA1XYZ, JE2ABC,
> > > JA5QQQ and JA3DEF are claiming single operator, it is easy to busy
> > > them for using packet if a few instances like this occur.
> > >
> > > > If there was a spot showing me as KQ4A 7.017.3, I would see
> it and add
> > > > a lot of extra DE NY4A until it got corrected.
> > >
> > > Wow.
> > >
> > > All of this makes me feel even more that packet is poison.
> > >
> > > Tree
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TRLog mailing list
> > > TRLog@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TRLog mailing list
> > TRLog@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TRLog mailing list
> TRLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
>