[TRLog] A perfect contest (?)

[Dale L Martin]

I was also using 6.69 during ARRL SS CW and agree with Pete: It worked
flawlessly (albeit operator disfunctions, mis-typing, etc.).

The only thing at KG5U that needed help, repair, modification, asistance,
was KG5U hisself.

That being said, I still with my suggestion would be picked up at some time
in future:
Have two small QSO 'windows', one for R1, one for R2, side-by-side, and be
able to tab between the two.  That would be very cool.

Until then, Alt-D, spacebar will have to do.

73,
dale, kg5u

> -----Original Message-----
> From: trlog-admin@contesting.com [mailto:trlog-admin@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of Pete Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 4:13 PM
> To: trlog@contesting.com
> Subject: [TRLog] A perfect contest (?)
>
>
> Certainly not the operator, but the software.  I was using 6.69,
> SO2R, and
> everything worked perfectly throughout -- not a single boggle, NONSSB,
> 220MHZ QSO or any other foolish stuff.  It might even make sense
> to revert
> to this version and then, very carefully, re-add most of the
> changes since
> then, to aid in tracking down the bugs.
>
> By the way, special thanks to KL7XX who obligingly moved "up 1" for me
> after working a stateside runner, for section 79.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Sometimes a tower is just a tower
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TRLog mailing list
> TRLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog