[TRLog] New Release

[Ron D. Rossi]

The algorithm is simply to compare the frequency change from the previous 
sample and compare it to the sensitivity (Hz/sec) divided by the sample rate 
(samples/sec). So for the default 1000Hz/sec at the default 10 samples/sec 
rate a change of greater than 100 Hz in one sample will trigger S&P. I could 
probably change this to some kind of moving average over say 5 samples. For 
rigs which "talk while tuning" this would be fine. I would have to experiment 
with rigs like the TS850 which don't "talk while tuning" (they listen though).

-- 
73 es God Bless de KK1L...ron rossi(kk1l@arrl.net) <><
Support Programmer for TRLog http://www.qth.com/tr
QTH: Jericho, Vermont
My page: http://www.qsl.net/kk1l


>>>Michael Dinkelman said:
> Hello Ron
> 
> Here is the results of some testing I did today
> 
> The ts-940 tunes in 10 Hz increments. If I move the RIT
> off frequency >100Hz (i.e 110Hz) and press Clear - the radio
> goes into S&P mode. Tuning the RIT more than >100Hz in less
> than a second causes the same symptom (I have my
> sensitivity set to the default 1000Hz).
> 
> I then set my sensitivity to 2000Hz. Then, it takes
> greater than >200Hz (210Hz) to cause the same symptom.
> 
> Same with sensitivity at 3000. A movement greater than 300Hz
> cause S&P.
> 
> Same at higher sensitivities. Looks like the sensitivity is off
> by a factor of ten. I need to set my sensitivity to 5000 to be
> able to use my RIT normally and still get the S&P to
> turn on like it used too (setting it even higher - I
> have to really spin the dial :>)
> 
> Let me know if I can be of assistance.
> 
> 73
> dink, n7wa
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 09:42 PM 12/29/02 -0500, you wrote:
> >Version 6.72??? If so, what is the tuning increment of the 940?
> >
> >Michael Dinkelman wrote:
> > >
> > > I haven't heard anybody else complain about this.
> > >
> > > New version, auto S&P swithes on way too easily.
> > > I have TS940 - simply moving the RIT would cause me
> > > to swith into S&P mode. If I moved it real slow, no
> > > problem but hitting the CLEAR RIT did it too.
> > >
> 
>