[TRLog] Re: TRLog digest, Vol 1 #265 - 11 msgs

[Frank Davis]

In the NAQP.DOM file that I have that came with 6.72A here is what it =
shows:

vO1 =3D VO1, NF

vO2 =3D VO2, LAB

This is correct as Labrador territory and Newfoundland island are =
separate mults in NAQP

73 Frank VO1HP.

  Message: 3
  From: K5NZ@aol.com
  Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 14:26:20 EST
  To: trlog@contesting.com
  Subject: [TRLog] More on NAQP Problem

  I have traced it down to one of these lines in the "new" naqp.dom =
causing the=20
  problem

  vo =3D vo,nf,lab

  md =3D md,mary,dc

  remove these 2 lines and the "new" naqp.dom works fine with tr 672...

  nz


  Message: 4
  From: K5NZ@aol.com
  Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 17:32:58 EST
  To: trlog@contesting.com
  Subject: [TRLog] NAQP

  Last post on this... Looks like the "new" naqp.dom problem was just =
that the=20
  line

  vo =3D vo, nf, lab  needed to be  vo1=3D vo, nf, lab

  With this corrected 672 logs qso's just fine.

  I assume the rest of the file has the multipliers correct?  Such a =
simple=20
  thing and what a mess it caused for us who went and downloaded the =
newest=20
  naqp.dom as we were advised to.  These updates should have been =
supplied with=20
  the TR 672 program updates.

  Mike K5NZ


  --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
  multipart/alternative
    text/plain (text body -- kept)
    text/html
  ---

  --__--__--

  Message: 5
  Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 15:08:28 -0800
  From: George Fremin III - K5TR <geoiii@kkn.net>
  To: K5NZ@aol.com
  Cc: trlog@contesting.com
  Subject: Re: [TRLog] NAQP

  On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 05:32:58PM -0500, K5NZ@aol.com wrote:
  > Last post on this... Looks like the "new" naqp.dom problem was just =
that the=20
  > line
  >=20
  > vo =3D vo, nf, lab  needed to be  vo1=3D vo, nf, lab
  >=20
  > With this corrected 672 logs qso's just fine.
  >=20
  > I assume the rest of the file has the multipliers correct?  Such a =
simple=20
  > thing and what a mess it caused for us who went and downloaded the =
newest=20
  > naqp.dom as we were advised to.  These updates should have been =
supplied with=20
  > the TR 672 program updates.

  Who advised you to download this file?

  And where did you download it from?

  As far as I can tell the files that are in the all672.zip file
  do not have the problems that you describe.

  --=20
  George Fremin III - K5TR
  geoiii@kkn.net
  http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr





--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---