[Trlog] Exchange Memory failure

[Fred Jensen]

Is the supply of "unknown ('til now) flags" for LOG.CFG really endless,
as it seems?

Fred K6DGW
Auburn CA CM98

Tree wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 10:38:06AM -0700, Jim Duffy wrote:
> > You didn't mention any flag.....try again.....I"m all ears.
> > Jim
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tree" <tree at kkn.net>
> > To: "Jim Duffy" <w6eu at jps.net>
> > Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 10:34 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Trlog] Exchange Memory failure
> >
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 10:17:33AM -0700, Jim Duffy wrote:
> > >
> > > > I may have gone in and corrected one qso's data, is that what you mean?
> > >
> > > Yes - if the time stamp for the log file shows it has been edited after
> > > the program was exited - the exchange information will be lost (unless
> > > you have the flag I mentioned turned on).  Turning on that flag will make
> > > the program recompute the partial call and initial exchange information
> > > from the log - but it takes longer for it to start up.
> 
> Oh sorry - I had it in my draft, but then deleted it.
> 
> PARTIAL CALL LOAD LOG ENABLE = TRUE
> 
> Tree
> _______________________________________________
> Trlog mailing list
> Trlog at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog