[Trlog] CQ160 and version 6.93

[John Unger]

Hi Mike -

For what it's worth, here's how I have smartdrv set up in my autoexec.bat 
file for TR:

LH /L:0;1,42384 /S smartdrv.exe
smartdrv /c

I would have to go back and look up what the LH command line parameters 
actually do...

73 - John, W4AU


At 02:38 PM 3/1/2009, you wrote:
>I am using "smartdrv" although I'm not 100% sure I have it set up perfectly.
>I am working on this aspect.
>
>I tried versions 6.88/6.79, 6.90, 6.92 and 6.93 and with a log of 500 q's
>the delays are approximately 1 sec (6.88/6.79), 2 sec (6.90 and 6.92 and 3
>seconds for 6.93.  Delay was not noticeable until several hundred q's were
>in the log.
>
>The time delay is after entering a call and hitting 'enter' until the cursor
>shows up in the exchange field.
>
>Mike W9RE
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tree [mailto:tree at kkn.net]
>Sent: February 28, 2009 4:16 PM
>To: Mike Wetzel
>Cc: 'TRLog Reflector'
>Subject: Re: [Trlog] CQ160 and version 6.93
>
>On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 04:15:06PM -0500, Mike Wetzel wrote:
>
> > Using 6.93 my computer really seems to be a lot slower.  After I hit the
> > return to log the call things stand still for a second or so and I am not
> > able to see if the section is there before I type it in.  Anyone else
>seeing
> > this slowness or is it just me?
>
>Are you using a disk cache?
>
>Tree
>
>_______________________________________________
>Trlog mailing list
>Trlog at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.5/1978 - Release Date: 03/01/09 
>07:04:00