[Trlog] Winkeyer support in 0.53

Martin Kratoska martin at ok1rr.com
Sun Aug 21 05:28:40 EDT 2022


Testing on the Lubuntu 22.04.1 LTS (jammy), 64 bit

Tested also with two other keyers, WK 2.3 compatible (K3NG code) - the 
same results.

Tested my trlog compiled from the sources and also the prebuilt binary - 
no difference.

It is not clear to me how the system can affect the nonsensically set 
default values (SIDETONE ON, PTT ON) as well as the bad 
deinitialization. And why CQRlog (I am the co-author) does well the trick?

A strange game whose rules I don't understand...


73,
Martin, OK1RR



Dne 20. 08. 22 v 22:10 George Fremin III napsal(a):
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 08:15:43PM +0200, Martin Kratoska wrote:
>> The Winkeyer support in 0.53 is still defective. Testing on WK 3.1
> I am sorry to hear this is still not working for you.
>
> As you might recall - neither I nor W9CF could replicate this using
> our Winkeyers or other keyers we have avaliable.
>
> I tried both the sidetone issue and the truncated text issue and
> I could not make my WK fail in the way you describe.
>
> I just looked over the variouos messages on the list about this issue
> a few months ago.
>
> My understanding is you are compling from source and running this on
> linux.
>
> I did not see it mentioned but just we know are you using 64 bit or 32
> bit?
>
> Have you tried downloading the binary and running that?
>
> It would be interesting what your results are with running the
> prebuilt binary.
>
> You can get a 64 bit version here:
>
> https://github.com/trlinux/trlinux/releases
> 	
> It would be very interesting to know if the binary fails for you the same way the code you compile fails.
>
>> The perfectly functioning WK support in CQRlog can be an example of
>> how it can be... I am so sorry...
> You are welcome to submit a PR with improvements to the WK code in trlinux.
>



More information about the Trlog mailing list