[UK-CONTEST] AFS SSB Saturday

[Chris Burbanks]

1 - The two statements appear to be identical and don't make much sense 
anyway
2 - I now have this vision of someone sitting at his AR88D & BC221, 
carefully tuning up and down the band looking for miscreants.
3 - Why would it encourage people to to do what they are entitled to do?
4 - >400 watts. Oh golly, this is just not cricket.

Chris G3SJJ


Peter Robinson wrote:

>We had an interesting discusion at our club (Taunton and Dist) regarding the frequency allocation for AFS SSB next weekend.
>One member has E mailed me and his observation is as follows
>
>The 'Contest Preferred Segments' and 'you must NOT...' are a contradiction of terms.
>Obviously, if the 80m band is 'policed', QSOs outside of the Preferred Segments can be disqualified, but this will only encourage the use of linears INSIDE the P.S.s and some people using more than  the legal limit of 400 watts.  How are they being policed?
>
>The 'Contest Preferred Segments' and 'you must NOT...' are a contradiction of terms.
>Obviously, if the 80m band is 'policed', QSOs outside of the Preferred Segments can be disqualified, but this will only encourage the use of linears INSIDE the P.S.s and some people using more than  the legal limit of 400 watts.  How are they being policed?
>
>We will be interested to hear your comments
>
>Peter G0EYR
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 06/01/2005
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>