[UK-CONTEST] ARRL Contesting White Paper

[G3WVG]

Well, I have to say that after a quick look, I though it was a pretty good
read! On balance, I would say that if one were new to contesting then it
would be useful.  And, if one were experienced then it would be a good
reminder of how one should behave.

73 Ian G3WVG

-----Original Message-----
From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ian White GM3SEK
Sent: 03 February 2006 09:27
To: uk-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] ARRL Contesting White Paper

Jim Martin - MM0BQI wrote:
>Very interesting discussion document from the ARRL 'Contest Committee', 
>worth a read!
>
>
>http://www.arrl.org/contests/hf-faq.html

That is awful! It's vague, rambling, occasionally meaningless, and above 
all it leaves out big questions like: "In the 21st century, what is a 
'claimed' QSO? What is a 'dupe'? And why?"

The answers to those questions are more likely to be found on the HFCC 
and IOTA sites!


-- 
73 from Ian GM3SEK

_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest