[UK-CONTEST] AFS

[Peter Hobbs]

But Clive, the winner and upper echelon in the results is based upon the 'A'
team.  Reducing that team to three will make it more difficult for any club
with 'new' operators to make much impression on the leaders, probably for
many years.  Is that what we want?  In the case of HARC, yes we do need to
scratch around to achieve a full house, but that process is useful in
itself.

Regards

Peter G3LET

> G4BUO said " My personal feeling is that reducing the CW leg may have the
> consequence of reducing the overall activity level, since some who are
> currently cajoled into operating to make up the numbers won't feel they
> have to bother."

> GM3POI said "Dave but what has been pointed out is that a club could put
in as many
> entries as they like but by making the minimum Three it would raise the
> overall full entry numbers. If AFS is going to die it will anyway but
there
> is no sign of that happening just yet."