[UK-CONTEST] February 2006 Radcom
G3SJJ
g3sjj at btinternet.com
Fri Jan 20 03:51:32 EST 2006
Showing your age Tom - "In a brief but extraordinary career, Yazoo
forged an unlikely partnership between electronics and the blues to
create some of the most sublime pop music of the early Eighties. *Vince
Clarke* and *Genevieve Alison Moyet* (otherwise known as Alf) were
together as Yazoo little over a year (1982-3) but from the instant
stardom of their debut single *'Only You'* onwards they made records
that captured the imagination of everyone from Smash Hits to the Daily
Telegraph. Their albums *'Upstairs At Eric's'* and *'You And Me Both'*
still define a time in pop history when experimentalism and creativity
broke through commercial barriers and the most unlikely people could
become pop stars."
SJJ
Tom Wylie wrote:
>Errr ummm - whats a yazoo???
>
>tom
>fdm
>
>
>G3SJJ wrote:
>
>
>
>>There is a saying that goes something like "You're either with us or
>>agen us." It is plain where we are so I have given up ranting about
>>this, just a few observations:
>>
>>- I agree that the figure of 55,000 is misleading. I can think of many
>>callsigns locally and nationally that are not active and probably would
>>not know the difference between 599001 and WSJT.
>>
>>- I feel aggrieved for the contributors who are trying their best under
>>difficult circumstances. Probably more so now than ever before.
>>
>>- Apart from Colin G3PSM, who does a tremendous amount of work on our
>>behalf, I don't recognise any callsigns or names of officials other than
>>G0TWW! Yet the following contributors are also members of this
>>Reflector, now doesn't that paint a picture? Listed in order of
>>appearance : G3ZVW, G3ORY, G3XTT, G4BUO and G4VXE, GM3SEK, G3ZVW (not a
>>dupe!) so now we know who keeps RadCom going. Contesters !! Well done guys.
>>
>>- Where have all the well known names gone? Do they know something we
>>don't? The society was much stronger with these people.
>>
>>- With reference to Tim G4VXE's column, I am sure it is not his doing
>>but he is limited to just three paragraphs, then normal contest reports
>>are integrated into his column. Another indicator of the downward slope.
>>
>>And finally, the new President is looking for a circuit diagram for a
>>yacht radio. Guess we should be thankful he knows what a circuit diagram
>>is! The last one didn't know the difference between Yaesu and Yazoo!
>>
>>And finally, finally!! David G3FPQ gets a mention for 60 years
>>membership. And who has one of the best signals on 40m, 80, 160 and any
>>other band for that matter? Well done mate.
>>
>>They're agen us. Chris G3SJJ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Colin Potter wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hi Colin,
>>>
>>>Surely the figure of 55,000 should be replaced by the number of hams who are
>>>actually active and who are rather few going by the number you hear on the
>>>air. My guess is that while a some go on the repeaters and some more are in
>>>natter nets on 80m, the numbers of truly active but non-contesting hams may
>>>be a minority.
>>>
>>>Regarding this month's RadCom - I cannot even see reference to the contest
>>>page in the "Regulars" section of the Contents!! Shame!
>>>
>>>Incidentally, I would be much more interested in occasional articles and the
>>>cover featuring the hard-working regular contributors to RadCom rather than
>>>"celebrities" however worthy, including PAXMAS...
>>>
>>>73 Colin M0DDT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "col" <col at v21mail.co.uk>
>>>To: "Chris Tran" <zl1ct at gm7v.com>; <uk-contest at contesting.com>
>>>Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:14 PM
>>>Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] February 2006 Radcom
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi Chris
>>>>
>>>>I agree with your comments on the importance of the contesting community.
>>>>However I have come to accept that our particular interest in the hobby is
>>>>seen as a minority interest. How many UK amateurs actively contest? I
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>would
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>suggest a figure in the low hundreds. I am not sure of the exact total of
>>>>currently licensed amateurs but RSGB suggests 55,000.
>>>>if we are generous and suggest 550 active Amateurs contest out of 55,000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>we
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>are a 1% minority!
>>>>Who can blame the RSGB for not devoting more than 2 pages to a 1%
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>minority!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I am surprised its not down to 1 page to be honest!
>>>>
>>>>I don't want to over simplify the argument as I know how many developments
>>>>contesting contributes to (antenna design, station aids, software etc)
>>>>It does beg the question would the UK contesting community be better
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>served
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>by a Separate national society or foundation, with its own web site and
>>>>e-publication? An extension of uk-contest if you like.Where all relevant
>>>>information, news, contest calendars, results can be displayed. I know its
>>>>an onerous task to run a web site and keep it updated.
>>>>
>>>>I don't know if there would be enough interest to make it worthwhile, but
>>>>would certainly offer help to anyone with the ability and contest
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>knowledge
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>to put it together.I unfortunately don't have the necessary IT skills to
>>>>make it happen!
>>>>
>>>>73 Colin GM0RLZ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "Chris Tran" <zl1ct at gm7v.com>
>>>>To: <uk-contest at contesting.com>
>>>>Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:19 PM
>>>>Subject: [UK-CONTEST] February 2006 Radcom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hello all
>>>>>
>>>>>Feb. 2006 'Radcom' arrived today in the Highlands. I'm disappointed
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>that
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>no-one on the Radcom editorial staff seems to understand the importance
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>of
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>contesting to our hobby - for example, why is Tim G4VXE forced to
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>squeeze
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>everything into 2 pages (P54/55 - not even in the index !) while there
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>are
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>acres of wasted space at the top of pages ? Also, the members ads could
>>>>>be
>>>>>made much smaller, etc.....
>>>>>
>>>>>The letter from G3NCN on P.96 is also a waste of space - he even
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>concedes
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>that non-contesters are the 'minority' on the CQ WW weekends especially.
>>>>>All
>>>>>this has been gone over ad nauseum.
>>>>>
>>>>>In between hastily installing an antenna to work 3Y0, I feel a letter to
>>>>>the
>>>>>Editor coming on ....
>>>>>
>>>>>73
>>>>>Chris
>>>>>GM3WOJ/ZL1CT
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>UK-Contest mailing list
>>>>>UK-Contest at contesting.com
>>>>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date:
>>>>>18/01/2006
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>UK-Contest mailing list
>>>>UK-Contest at contesting.com
>>>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.14.19/231 - Release Date:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>16/01/2006
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>UK-Contest mailing list
>>UK-Contest at contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>UK-Contest mailing list
>UK-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>
>
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list