[UK-CONTEST] Ofcom/RSGB meeting

[Ed - G3SQX]

I think the result from the Ofcom/RSGB meeting has been excellent.  It has 
certainly achieved more than the ones we had when I was involved, that is, 
in the equivalent meetings between the RSGB and the RA.  My impression is 
that this due to a large extent to G3PSM, and he deserves thanks and 
plaudits for what has been achieved.  Part of the big difference was that in 
the olden days (only 3-4 years ago), the idea of any publicity for what 
would be discussed and for the results was completely out of the question.

We're not all going to be happy, so skip the next bit unless you're 
interested.  Here's my take on the outcome --

<<  The use of suffixes i.e. /A, /M, /MM, /P will not be mandatory.  >>

This is excellent, and is something I was peddling a couple of weeks ago. 
I'm not sure what M5AAV means when he writes "Oh boy" and sighs.  I can't 
see any disadvantages -- the Americans seem to manage without perfectly 
well.

<<  The additional Club prefixes will remain but the usage will be optional. 
 >>

Not a good idea, but if we have to have them why can't they be available to 
everyone, not just clubs?  The proposed rule is illogical.

<<  Clause 10 on Unattended and remote control operation will be re-written 
in plain English  >>

What a great, novel idea!

<<  We are going to take yet another look at Clause 13 - Identification and 
the various interpretations that can be used.  >>

OK, as long as we don't make normal HF and contest operation (theoretically) 
illegal.

<<  Foundation licences will be permitted access to the Amateur Satellite 
Service as well as the 10GHz microwave band.  >>

I half agree with GI4NKB, who wants more incentives for progression through 
the system.  There is definitely a case to be made for more distinctions, 
not fewer.  Perhaps we can get Vanity calls for Advanced licensees only, 
which would be something.  I vehemently disagree with GI4NKB when he says 
"Why are the RSGB not representing the views of the majority of Amateurs in 
respect of the FL and arriving at a FL that will be acceptable to the 
majority?"  The majority of Amateurs are totally unrepresentative of those 
who might consider getting a Foundation Licence, and therefore should have 
their views considered, but should not dominate.  Insofar as it's possible, 
the entry level licence ought to be reasonable both in terms of what people 
need to know to operate tolerably well, and the extent to which the licence 
fits in with the rest of the system.  The Foundation Licence is far from 
perfect, but the situation is absolutely nothing like the dark picture that 
GI4NKB presents.

73,

Ed, G3SQX