[UK-CONTEST] The RSGB/Ofcom discussions
Colin G3PSM
colin at g3psm.net
Thu Jul 13 04:39:16 EDT 2006
Yes, the majority of the microwave bands where of course the greater
challenges exist.
73
Colin, G3PSM
Douglas Maxwell wrote:
>Is there any band a FL doesn't have access to?
>
>Doug
>GM0ELP
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Colin G3PSM" <colin at g3psm.net>
>To: "Uk-Contest at Contesting.Com" <uk-contest at contesting.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 8:02 PM
>Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] The RSGB/Ofcom discussions
>
>
>
>
>>I have deliberately avoided getting involved with the semantics of the
>>other discussion but in answer to Phil's questions -
>>
>>
>>
>>>I was interested to learn that the FL's will get access to the satellite
>>>service! Not sure whether that is really necessary, as I do agree (in
>>>
>>>
>this
>
>
>>>small part) that the FL's need some sort of incentive.
>>>I do have one query though........... Will the M3's get access to 28MHz?
>>>I have always thought it odd that they cannot use 10m, but can use 30m!
>>>
>>>
>OK,
>
>
>>>I suppose they could use RTTY/PSK on 30m, but it is mainly CW only, and
>>>there are very few M3's using CW.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>This announcement has already been made that this will happen from 1st
>>October
>>
>>
>>
>>>The one part of Colin's email I don't grasp is
>>>"The additional Club prefixes will remain but the usage will be optional.
>>>
>>>
>"
>
>
>>>So what is the point? Surely it is optional now? Or have I missed a
>>>
>>>
>serious
>
>
>>>point here?
>>>
>>>
>>>Why are we bothering with GX/GP etc etc? Our club has the call GU3HFN,
>>>
>>>
>and
>
>
>>>that is what is uses.
>>>There were times in the past when GP3HFN was aired, but it only seemed to
>>>cause major confusion, especially to non-G stations. Indeed, there are
>>>
>>>
>many
>
>
>>>outside the UK that can't even cope with 2U0/MU3 calls!
>>>I handle the GU/MU QSL cards, and see a large number of cards intended
>>>
>>>
>for
>
>
>>>2U0 calls written as GU0.
>>>So why do we need GX/GP etc?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>The intention is to regularise the situation where the additional club
>>prefix should only have been used to pass greetings messages as per
>>Clause 1(8) of the current BR68. This requirement no longer exists but
>>it transpires that a number of clubs have invested in QSL cards,
>>T-shirts and the like. As is the situation for log-keeping and using
>>suffixes, you don't HAVE to do it, because there is no legal requirement
>>but the opportunity is there should you wish to do so.
>>
>>Can I just add that I am just the person who co-ordinated the responses
>>and presented the case to Ofcom. There are many more people and
>>organisations who provided the input, including a number on this
>>
>>
>reflector.
>
>
>>73
>>_______________________________________________
>>UK-Contest mailing list
>>UK-Contest at contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>
>>
>>--
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/385 - Release Date: 7/11/2006
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list