[UK-CONTEST] CQWW/SSB

Darren G0TSM uk-contest at g0tsm.com
Wed Oct 18 19:52:17 EDT 2006


Noz C5DXC picked up my licence today, call is confirmed as C52T, that 
will save an afternoon fetching a piece of paper.

Yes using the cluster talk/messenger etc during a contest to make QSOs 
is a big no-no, all contesters know that anyway.
I've always been a 6m fan and those openings don't tend to last too 
long, so as I said I'd welcome a Talk message if anyone wants a QSY to 6 
during the contest.

Just been looking at the predictions for certain paths, C5 Longpath into 
W6 and JA looks interesting with a MUF of over 28MHz, it would be 
interesting to see if these paths actually exist or simply program 
glitches, we'll find out next week.

Darren G0TSM


 




Ian G3WVG wrote:
> Hi Mike ..
>
> Yes. quite right.  As I said earlier I'm sure Darren has absolutely no
> intention of circumventing any contest rules.
>
> 73 Ian   
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ruttenberg
> G7TWC
> Sent: 18 October 2006 22:26
> To: Ian G3WVG; UK Contest
> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] CQWW/SSB
>
> How is QSYing to a band not in the contest a breach of contest rules? It
> isn't soliciting a contact for the contest, as 6m isn't a contest band in
> CQWW.
>
> I would understand if 6m was in the contest, but it isn't, so it's a red
> herring.
>
> Mike
> G7TWC
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ian G3WVG" <g3wvg at btinternet.com>
> To: "UK Contest" <uk-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] CQWW/SSB
>
>
>   
>> I'm sure that Darren has absolutely the correct intentions and was
>>     
> referring
>   
>> to casual contacts before and after the contest.
>>
>> Because, obviously, during the contest, any station asking him to QSY
>>     
> would
>   
>> be disqualified for soliciting a QSO, and in my opinion if the QSO
>>     
> actually
>   
>> took place then both should be disqualified.
>>
>> 73 Ian
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
>> [mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Peter Hobbs
>> Sent: 18 October 2006 19:25
>> To: UK Contest reflector
>> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] CQWW/SSB
>>
>>  I'll be able to receive 'Talk' messages if anyone
>>     
>>> wants a QSY.
>>>       
>> Did I read the CQWW rules wrongly, or are skeds arranged by telephone,
>> internet etc. a disqualifiable breach?
>>
>> Peter G3LET
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> UK-Contest mailing list
>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> UK-Contest mailing list
>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>
>   



More information about the UK-Contest mailing list