[UK-CONTEST] AFS - and 3570 - 3590
Dave Sergeant
dave at davesergeant.com
Sun Jan 14 14:07:33 EST 2007
On 14 Jan 2007 at 18:55, G3SVL wrote:
> That was fun. Band in pretty good shape down on the Sussex
> Coast. Looks like 214 good QSO's - mostly G's, seemed to be fewer
> DL's this year. Tnx to all who worked me.
145 QSOs here with my K2 at QRP 5W. Steady rate till the last half
hour than ran out of new stations to work as is always the case.
> But can I pose a potentially controversial question - do we need to
> give up 25% of the contest space for the QRS area? It seemed
> relatively empty to me whenever I tuned around there. Halving it and
> putting the extra 10KHz into the pot might make it easier for the bulk
> of the entrants. BTW, I absolutely do not want to see the slow-speed
> area removed, but it just seems too wide.
>
> Tin hat on
>
No need for the tin hat. I ventured above 3570 on a few occasions
expecting to find loads of beginners sending very slowly. There
seemed to be very few of those and most of those sending slow were
the big boys (judging from their serial nos at least...).
Interspersed were quite a few well known stations sending at their
normal QRQ. So I did not feel guilty about turning the speed up
myself..
Having the QRS slot right up to 3590 is a mixed blessing. There was
plenty of PSK activity just above 3570 and the area above 3580 was
largely occupied by rtty and not really useable - I heard no AFS
activity up there. I am not sure we should have a published cw
contest frequency range which clashes with the data area, I should
think they were a bit upset...
73 Dave G3YMC
http://www.davesergeant.com
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list