[UK-CONTEST] Fw: Redundant contest reports? (SSB CC (and other80mcontests))
David, G3YYD
g3yyd at btinternet.com
Thu Feb 5 09:06:20 EST 2009
I no longer see RST as being useful in contests. Even in normal DXing
with a huge pile up how many give anything other than 59(9)? Very very
few. I have never heard a T report less than 9.
If RST is kept then on CW we should get rid of the T and replace it with
bandwidth occupied. In the last CQ WW 160 CW contest a G3 station had a
huge occupied bandwidth due to the key clicks he was generating. If he
had received lots of "you are very wide" reports may be he would have
got used a standby rig or fixed his rig for the next contest. This guy's
signal width was so exceptional that it attracted comments on KST.
David G3YYD
>
> I won't bore you with the "T" definitions, which originally date from the
> days of spark and MCW and are usually superfluous today (except for the "C"
> and "K" which can follow)
>
> 73, Peter G3LET
>
>
>
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list