[UK-CONTEST] Ropoco and results analysis

[gw0etf at btinternet.com]

>From the adjudicator's summary of the recent Ropoco 1 results....


"..This year's contest is notable for two reasons, a good proportion of first time entrants and a bumper crop of error-free logs, 19 in total.."

Needless to say mine wasn't one of the 19 (I lost one). Wouldn't it be interesting/informative to know how and what I cocked up, particularly in Ropoco? I suppose I'm talking of a UBN type system but I vaguely recall this being disussed here several years ago with the conclusion that it's non-trivial and significant extra work for adjudicators. 

Perhaps things have moved on since then as per the now lightning quick results turnaround in the CCs and Sprints..?

73,

Stewart Rolfe, GW0ETF