[UK-CONTEST] ANTENNA SUPPORT
Don Beattie
g3ozf at btinternet.com
Wed Jun 24 09:05:45 PDT 2009
Thanks to all who commented on my question about dipoles attached above the
beam. There were several themes to the replies, and I'm summarising them
here as some asked that the responses be shared around the group.
The first and simplest approach was the "why worry" approach - a short
length of ropeattached at the top of the mast, which had enough length
before the dipole centrepiece to accommodate a turn of the mast.
A more sophisticated version was to use a length of thin rope. Attach one
end right at the top of the pole and wrap around the pole in a clockwise
direction then fed it through a pulley and back to the tower a few inches
below the top and wrap around the pole one turn clockwise before attaching.
The pulley should now not move as the pole is rotated. The rope unwinds and
winds itself off/onto the top of the mast, with the puley staying in the
same position..
Others drew my attention to the April 2009 RadCom (which I had forgotten)
where Ian GM3SEK outlined a "bearing" approach to attaching dipoles at the
top of rotating masts. A variant on this commented on by some involved
dropping a second pole (very lose fit and perhaps plastic/nylon/fibreglass)
into the top of the stub-mast, making sure it was greased so that it could
turn inside the mast and was stopped from dropping fully into the mast by
some sort of clamp at its top. To this clamp is attached the pulley/halyard
for the dipole.
There was a lot of support for a non-conducting top section at the top of
the stub-mast, to avoid the dipole conductors touching the mast as things
move.
All in all, a great set of replies. Thanks to everyone who replied. Now -
where's the hacksaw ?
73
Don, G3BJ
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list