[UK-CONTEST] Feb 144 UKAC

[G3RIR]

 Ray,

My point is that I like the challenge of searching for the additional
squares and surely that aspect of operating is worth something? Maybe it
should not be worth enough to skew the result in favour of someone working
28000km over 35000km total but the challenge of the search for the
multipliers has to be worth a little? Perhaps excluding all adjacent squares
as multipliers might be an option? And of course working GM on any VHF and
Up band is a real challenge from my modest site and always gives me a buzz.

73

Neil, G3RIR



-----Original Message-----
From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ray James
Sent: 06 February 2010 14:16
To: UK-Contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Feb 144 UKAC



--- On Sat, 6/2/10, G3RIR <g3rir at yahoo.com> wrote:

> I am alone in wishing to keep the multipliers? 

M2 skews the results away from excellent performance to favour those who can
pick up the most squares.
A strange logic that competitors believe someone who worked 28,000Km has
outperformed someone who worked 35,000km.

73 Ray GM4CXM 




      
_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest