[UK-CONTEST] CW Speed etc...

[Nigel G3TXF]

Sorry to be a call-sign database nurd, but there have been
several references on here recently to "RD3AM". Don't you
mean RD3AF?

73 - Nigel G3TXF

-----Original Message-----
From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Colin Wilson
Sent: 24 February 2010 15:32
To: Chris G3SJJ
Cc: uk-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] ARRL CW

Chris

your right in saying one should try to stay flexible its the
ones like RD3AM that need to apply this attitude instead of
ploughing on filling the bands with RF but having little or
no QSO's!
73

Colin G3VCQ/J38CW
www.sheffield-live.co.uk

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris G3SJJ" <g3sjj at btinternet.com>
Cc: <uk-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] ARRL CW


> No flack Colin but I think you have to have a flexible
attitude to all
> of this. Each contest has it own character and different
times of that
> event can require a different approach.
>
> If the Qs are available then a higher speed will help your
rate (Q/H)
> conversely if it isn't happening then filling the band
with RF will
> attract the punters, so slowing down and having a nice
rhythmical style
> will probably help.
>
> One of the worst examples I can recall was RD3AM last
year. I can't
> remember the contest but at one stage he was CQing at 35 -
40wpm with
> speeded up bits of maybe 50+ wpm, (obviously to save time
;-) ) yet
> attracting no business. My guess was that if he had slowed
down and
> taken out the silly stuff he would have increased his
rate, as you
> rightly suggest.
>
> Its all about selling yourself to your target audience.
(The big E!) If
> you get it right you get the Qs!
>
> Chris G3SJJ
>
>
>
> Colin Wilson wrote:
>> All
>>
>> Interesting story John what with the BERU up next for us,
as an ex
>> professional I recall you should not TX faster than one
can RX!  I too 
>> have
>> experienced this on many a CW contest and its not clever
nor is it good
>> practice.  On the other foot many call in faster than you
TX and expect 
>> to
>> be read!  None of this will encourage new CW ops to take
part in 
>> contesting
>> so we need to remember that not everyone can read 35wpm
and you are
>> therefore probably missing some points! For me I think a
good  CQ rate is
>> between 26-28wpm, most can read this with ease and its
fast enough to 
>> keep
>> your rates up but every now and then slow it down so
others that maybe
>> struggling stand a chance of getting your call and giving
you some extra
>> points!
>>
>> Just a thought, now I will get my hard hat on and standby
for the flack!
>> 73
>>
>> Colin G3VCQ/J38CW
>> www.sheffield-live.co.uk
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "G3LZQ John"
<johndunnington at johndunnington.karoo.co.uk>
>> To: "Chris G3SJJ" <g3sjj at btinternet.com>
>> Cc: <uk-contest at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 1:21 PM
>> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] ARRL CW
>>
>>
>>> Chris/Clive although not on full time and
>>> pretty much all S&P...I did note many times
>>> that many stations CQ'n at a rate of knots
>>> 30+ could never get my call first time unless
>>> I sent it at around 20wpm. The slick op's did
>>> every time even at 35wpm.
>>> I did wonder if they were using readers and
>>> not brains to read CW. Another observation
>>> was weak stations calling CQ rarely had
>>> multiple callers but loud and spotted were
>>> often a mess particularly from real W7-land.
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>> John G3LZQ
>>>
>
> -- 
>
> Visit the new FOC website at  http://www.g4foc.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>
73

Colin G3VCQ/J38CW
www.sheffield-live.co.uk



_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest