[UK-CONTEST] Unnecessary 80m CC rule tweaking?

[Clive GM3POI]

Carrying on from that: How about limiting a club team size to say 5 or 4
max based on highest scores but allow as many 5 member teams as wanted by a
club. However the overall score comes from not all those teams but from the
highest scoring  5.
	That way clubs do not have to invent ways of competing with other
large membership clubs, and the best win on the day without having to field
15 active members. 
	A  note to the CC when framing rules:   Don't forget you are
representing RSGB i.e. Great Britain Not just the Thames valley!
73 Clive GM3POI

-----Original Message-----
From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Andy Cook, G4PIQ
Sent: 29 December 2011 11:36
To: 'uk-contest'
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Unnecessary 80m CC rule tweaking?

To me this debate is rather spurious, simply because the club competition
element of the CCs isn't a fair contest - it's not bounded by a maximum team
size. 

At the design of these contests the decision was taken not to set a limit to
the number of entrants in order to that maximize participation - and that
decision has worked well. 

I really can't see how adding a distance limit to put some groups into
General category and some in a Local category should make anyone less likely
to enter. No-one is being excluded from entry - it's just which table you
end up in for 2012. If we really wanted to make the categories 'fairer',
then that distance limit should be supplemented with a maximum number of
team members constraint. 

Is 35km a bit small - probably yes IMO - but a line has to be drawn
somewhere. 

73,

Andy, G4PIQ

-----Original Message-----
From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ian Pritchard
Sent: 29 December 2011 11:07
To: Nigel G3TXF; uk-contest
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Unnecessary 80m CC rule tweaking?

Morning all
The contest group I operate for will never be at the top, we simply
don't  have sufficient numbers. Nevertheless we enjoy these increasingly
popular contests and take part when we can.  Activity has been increasing
year on year and operating standards steadily improving, so if the aim of
the events was to increase awareness and encourage contesting then they have
been a great success.
Presumably the recent rule changes have been prompted by whinges from a
minority of "local" clubs who are uncomfortable when they see their results
further down the table than they would like.  Other than to produce a second
results table so that "local" clubs can feel better about their performance
I can't see what positive results these changes will achieve.
73 Ian G3WVG (G0AAA Three As Contest Group)


_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4709 - Release Date: 12/28/11

_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest




=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 9.0.0.888, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.18950)
http://www.pctools.com/ =======





=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 9.0.0.888, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.18950)
http://www.pctools.com/
=======