[UK-CONTEST] interface problem

[David G3YYD]

Roger

Do you really need to use FSK? It is better to use AFSK as this gives 
more operational flexibility and avoids the FSK problem. However I know 
some rigs do not allow the narrow filters to be used with AFSK/SSB. 
(Please identify the rig to users if this is the case and they will know 
not to buy such a limited rig)

FSK/N1MM/MMTTY needs to use a dedicated serial port for the FSK shift. 
It cannot share the port with anything else. You also need to have the 
dedicated bit of software that goes with MMTTY for FSK. Sorry cannot 
remember the name of this software as I have always used AFSK and have 
never used FSK. Then need to set up the DI configuration for FSK. It is 
fully documented how to do this in the N1MM internet help.

If you want to get dedicated help with N1MM and MMTTY for FSK then join 
this yahoo group:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/N1MMLogger-Digital/

If you do a message search for FSK you will find huge number of messages 
on this topic.

73 David

On 21/01/2011 21:13, Roger Cooke wrote:
> Hi.
>
>    Is anybody using a G4ZLP Digimaster Pro + as an interface? If so, I could use
> your help please!
>
> Two of us recently visited John, G3XLL, to set him up on data using a Kenwood
> TS-480SAT
> transceiver, a PC with N1MM and the above interface.  We managed to get PSK
> going without
> much trouble, but RTTY using FSK is another matter. All we were getting is a
> single constant
> carrier. We could hear RTTY being generated, but the output of the transceiver (
> FSK ) was just
> the carrier.
>
>    I think that COMFSK will have to be used as well, although I am not familiar
> with this program,
>
> so if anybody has any suggestions or ideas, I would welcome them!
>
>
>
> Regards from Roger, G3LDI
> Swardeston, Norfolk.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest