[UK-CONTEST] Ending times etc.
Gordon Brown
gordonbrowns at btinternet.com
Sun Jan 23 14:56:14 PST 2011
Why on earth are so many people getting excited about starting and ending
times? The most anyone is going to gain is two QSO’s – one at the start and one
at the end. OK it’s almost cheating but it’s by no means the only nor most
profitable way people cheat in contests.
It is pointless pointing the finger at stations where one doubts the power level
they are using because they are obviously going to deny it and it would take
quite an effort to prove otherwise. Just tune over the band during a contest
and one can have serious doubts about some stations. I have been experimenting
with a way of detecting if a linear amplifier is being used with some unproved
success but there are ways of negating my findings and what is wrong with using
a linear to boost 5 Watts to 100 Watts? So I have been wasting my time?
During the last CC Data contest I had a local station, about two miles from me,
blocking my RX over 5kHz and another about the same distance an acceptable S9.
I know one was running 100Watts and I know which one was pushing his luck.
Assuming a club has all logs sent to a central point where they can be edited
before being submitted. The advantage in doing this is that they could ensure
all members work each other and errors in received calls can be checked although
I doubt they do that. Lets assume G1AA is a member of my club and I know he is
not in the contest. One of my club members G1BB, who is active, works G1CC and
we know that G1CC is a member of a usually high scoring club. All I have to do
is edit the log of G1BB and change G1CC to G1AA. Hey presto our club has
gained 2 QSO’s and our nearest challenger has lost 1 QSO a net gain to my club
of 6 QSO’s..
All this makes me wonder why we are so concerned about starting and ending times
to the nearest microsecond?
73
Gordon.
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list