[UK-CONTEST] UBN failures

[Paul Selwood]

Better still remove the auto 59 from all software

-----Original Message-----
From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of David G3YYD
Sent: 16 July 2011 10:44
To: UK-Contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] UBN failures

The obvious conclusion is always give 59 as the report then no problem.

73 David

On 16/07/2011 08:16, Roger Thawley wrote:
> I see an interesting trend within UBN reports received by M0GVG. A 
> number of failed contacts are due to broken reports and, in almost 
> every case, we have logged that the other station has given us a 
> report other than '59' but the other stations have all logged that they
have given us a '59' report.
> Typically, the report we have logged is similar to the report we have 
> sent, perhaps suggesting that both the logged reports are correct. I'm 
> left wondering if the other stations logging software is automatically 
> inserting '59' and if the other operators are failing to replace this 
> with the 'actual' report they sent.
>
>
>
> Roger, G0BSU (M0GVG/P)
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest