[UK-CONTEST] HF CW Field Day
G3WVG
g3wvg at btinternet.com
Fri Apr 13 01:47:29 PDT 2012
I absolutely agree with John G4IRN.. This really does seem like pandering to the "old guard". The "restricted section" is now synonymous with restricted ambition.
73 G3WVG aka G*0AAA/P .. Old but not "old guard"!
Sent from my i-telephone
On 13 Apr 2012, at 09:17, John Warburton G4IRN <qrz at dxdx.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> I note the amendment to the NFD rules: (c) a muting requirement applies
> to receivers used -- this brings operation close to "big knob-little
> knob" mode, and can be implemented with minimum external circuitry.
>
>
> As they initially stood, the new rules were exciting and a catalyst for
> innovation - the potential was there for the restricted section of NFD
> to be a training ground in leading-edge contest operating.
>
> I really thought that the contest committee were thinking in the future
> - why the back-track?
>
> As a team, we were gearing up to the challenge of two-transceiver
> (non-muted) operation in the restricted section. We felt this was a
> real opportunity to challenge the regular leading teams with new
> operating techniques. The opportunity was there to expose your
> once-a-year contester to world-class contesting methods - it's now just
> slipped away, along with the potential training ground for top-notch
> world contesters of the future.
>
> Poor decision, contest committee, very disappointing. Stinks of
> pandering to the old-guard.
>
> John G4IRN.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list