[UK-CONTEST] NFD
Ken.g3lvp
ken.g3lvp at btinternet.com
Fri Apr 20 12:46:57 PDT 2012
I fully support Derek's comments below:
From: Derek Thom G3NKS NFD and DARC Field Days
".......Judging by comments made here and elsewhere it seems that there
is still support for a basic Restricted Section - ie one antenna and one
transceiver and no fancy additional technology.
There are other considerations too for clubs and groups, such as the
availability of effort to erect more than one simple aerial and the
added complexity of a station with two transceivers etc. Hence I wish to
argue for the re-introduction of a basic Restricted Section for those of
us who want to be able to pit our operating skills against others in a
similar position, and not be burdened by over-complex equipment and
elaborate aerials systems.
Yes, I am one of the "old guard" (having taken part in nearly every NFD
since 1957) but from what I have heard and read I believe there to be
some considerable support for this. Given that much of the
cross-checking of logs and adjudication is carried out by clever
software (and I'm all for that!) it can't be that onerous to add another
section. So please can we have back the old-style Restricted Section
along side the new-style Restricted Section. I, and I'm sure many
others, would applaud such a decision. "
73...
Ken
G3LVP
(also taken part in many NFD's since 1957 - with Ilford RSGB group,
Chelmsford ARS, G4KF CG & Cheltenham ARA)
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list